Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-03-25 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than HTC One (M8), getting an 89 score against 71.9. Galaxy Note10's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the HTC One (M8). The HTC One (M8) features a better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior processing unit than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note10 has a much better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger diafragm aperture, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 counts with greater battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than the HTC One (M8), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.