Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-03-25 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a lot better than HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One (M8)'s, but it is also heavier.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better performance than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. HTC One (M8) has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a really smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little inferior pixels number per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior battery duration than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 12 mega-pixels resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than the HTC One (M8), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.