Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is way better than HTC One M9, having a 93.3 score against 77.7. IPhone 13 Pro's body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's also way heavier. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while HTC One M9 works with Android 5.0 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a bit sharper display than HTC One M9, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a bigger display. The iPhone 13 Pro features just a bit better performance than HTC One M9, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor and 2 less cores (but faster), and they both have a 64-bit CPU, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One M9, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.