Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is better than the HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is notably newer and extremely thinner, but way heavier than the HTC One M9. IPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 OS. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC One M9, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a 64-bit CPU, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with more RAM memory.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a lot lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, a lot smaller screen and a little less pixels per inch in the display. HTC One M9 has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One M9, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.