Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. IPhone X's body is extremely newer and extremely thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's just a little heavier. IPhone X counts with just a little better performance than HTC One M9, although it has less CPU cores and doesn't have an additional GPU, they both have a 64 bits processing unit and 3 GB of RAM.
HTC One M9 counts with a little more vivid display than iPhone X, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite lower screen density. The iPhone X and HTC One M9 both have really similar cameras, because although the iPhone X has a worse (4K) video resolution, a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera and a lot tinier camera sensor shooting way worse quality photographs, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
The iPhone X counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The HTC One M9 features just a little better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. If you want to save some money, you can buy HTC One M9, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.