Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is slightly better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. IPhone XR's design is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9's, but it's heavier. The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone XR has just a little better hardware performance than HTC One M9, although it has lesser CPU cores and doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, they both have a 64-bit processor and 3 GB of RAM memory. The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Apple iPhone XR features a bit better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 2942mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh. The iPhone XR's camera is just as good as the HTC One M9 one, because although the iPhone XR has a back-facing camera with lot less MP, a lower video resolution and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One M9, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.