Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black glare |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a global score of 86.3, which is better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. The Asus ROG Phone 3 is a much newer device than HTC One M9, but it is heavier and a little thicker. The HTC One M9 features a little sharper screen than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a very superior storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. HTC One M9 has a bit faster processor than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra GPU.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh. The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a greater camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.