Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-02-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, with a global score of 77.7 against 76.2. HTC One M9's construction is a bit lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, but it's thicker and was released many years before. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor.
HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The HTC One M9 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.