Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 15 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a 77.7 score against 76.7. These devices include Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15. HTC One M9 features a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 counts with a lot better display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. The HTC One M9 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) have similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has better 60 fps video frame rate and a back camera with lot more megapixels, they both have the same (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.