Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminium | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a score of 77.7 against 77. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. HTC One M9 is an a lot older and thicker phone than Honor 50 Pro, but HTC managed to make it lighter anyway.
HTC One M9 features a bit faster processing unit than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a better display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also has a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Honor 50 Pro features a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.