Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K62 has a score of 78.2, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K62 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Even though the LG K62 is heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and incredibly newer.
HTC One M9 counts with just a little better performance than LG K62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a GPU. HTC One M9 counts with a lot better screen than LG K62, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and much more pixels per display inch.
LG K62 has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC One M9 counts with a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much lower resolution back camera and a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
The LG K62 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.