Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Titan gray |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, with an 85.4 score against 77.7. LG K92's body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the HTC One M9. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but LG K92 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives you some nice extra features.
The HTC One M9 has a much better screen than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little better screen density. The HTC One M9 counts with a little faster CPU than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional GPU.
The LG K92 has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG K92 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 41% more battery size. LG K92 features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG K92, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One M9, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.