Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Holographic white |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than LG Stylo 6, getting a general score of 77.7 against 76.7. These phones include Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. HTC One M9's construction is a lot lighter than LG Stylo 6, but it is somewhat thicker and was released 5 years before.
HTC One M9 has just a bit better performance than LG Stylo 6, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits CPU. The HTC One M9 features a more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 takes much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, HTC One M9 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.