Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with a 78.6 score against 77.7. These devices come with Android operating system, but LG V10 has newer 5.1 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Although LG V10 and HTC One M9 were only released 7 months apart, the LG V10 construction is somewhat thinner but also somewhat heavier than HTC One M9.
The LG V10 features just a bit better screen than HTC One M9, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440, a little larger screen and a little bit more pixels per display inch. The LG V10 features a very superior memory for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
HTC One M9 has a much better performance than LG V10, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor, a 64-bits processor and a greater number of cores. The LG V10 features a little better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V10 features a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One M9, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.