Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the HTC One M9, with an 81.3 score against 77.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer and thinner phone than HTC One M9, but it's just a little bit heavier. HTC One M9 has a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a bit lower screen pixels density and a quite smaller screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The HTC One M9 features a little faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The HTC One M9 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the HTC One M9 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a better resolution camera in the back.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One M9, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.