Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. These phones include Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The LG V40 ThinQ is a a lot newer and a lot thinner device than the HTC One M9, but it is a little bit heavier.
HTC One M9 has a bit better processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a way smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos, a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger aperture.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ is a little more expensive than HTC One M9, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.