Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue and White |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than HTC One M9, getting a global score of 87.6 against 77.7. The LG V60 ThinQ is a extremely newer and a little thinner device than the HTC One M9, although it's incredibly heavier. These phones use Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. HTC One M9 has just a bit better performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processing unit.
LG V60 ThinQ takes clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% more battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.