Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is better than HTC One M9, having an 86.1 score against 77.7. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 20's body is extremely newer and much thinner, but just a little heavier than HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. The HTC One M9 features a sharper display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density.
The Motorola Edge 20 counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola Edge 20 has a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 20 counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.