Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has the newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 has a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch of display. HTC One M9 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes greater videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a way better resolution back-facing camera, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.