Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than the HTC One M9, having a 92.8 score against 77.7. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Pro is heavier than the HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it offers lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
HTC One M9 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The HTC One M9 has a bit superior processor than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much higher 108 MP resolution camera. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 58 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.