Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a global score of 78.5, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a newer 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's design is incredibly newer and a lot thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bit CPU. The HTC One M9 features a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a much better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 55% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.