Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than HTC One M9, with a global score of 80.9 against 77.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is incredibly newer and thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores , an additional graphics processor and a 64-bit processor. HTC One M9 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a lot higher video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.