Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a bit better than HTC One M9, with a overall score of 78.9 against 77.7. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, counting with a couple nice extra features and better performance. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a lighter and thinner device than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 9 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The HTC One M9 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a bit better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot better video definition. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.