Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the HTC One M9, getting an 86.3 score against 77.7. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, giving a couple additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is way newer and thinner than HTC One M9's, but it is also somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a screen that's just as good as the HTC One M9 one, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The HTC One M9 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a back-facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution and a way larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features much more memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.