Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, counting with a couple nice extra features. Even though Moto G200 5G is noticeably heavier than the HTC One M9, it's a little thinner and also much newer.
The HTC One M9 has a better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each display inch. HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor.
The Moto G200 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G captures better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also has a camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.