Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G60s is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, with a general score of 79.9 against 77.7. Moto G60s is a extremely heavier cellphone than HTC One M9, but both of them have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G60s has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it offers a lot of extra features.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
Motorola Moto G60s captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a way larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Moto G60s counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Moto G60s counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.