Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a general score of 77.7 against 76.4. HTC One M9 is an older and extremely thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but HTC could make it a little lighter anyway. The HTC One M9 has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display.
HTC One M9 has a superior performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although they are slower), a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. The HTC One M9 takes clearer videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a worse 20 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has greater battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.