Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it's also a older, a little heavier and extremely thicker cellphone. HTC One M9 has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it has a little worse pixel number per display inch, a bit smaller screen and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
HTC One M9 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. HTC One M9 counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4% bigger battery size.
HTC One M9 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.