Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the HTC One M9, with a global score of 80.7 against 77.7. The Motorola One Vision is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner device than the HTC One M9, although it's also somewhat heavier. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU.
The HTC One M9 has a more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Motorola One Vision counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola One Vision has greater battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Vision shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a way larger camera aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.