Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 15 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| S-LCD 3 | LTPO |
| 441 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than HTC One M9, getting a 79.2 score against 77.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is newer and incredibly thinner, but also a lot heavier than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller display. The HTC One M9 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior memory to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 65% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, because it has a larger aperture, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.