Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Polar night |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a score of 80.5, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Nokia 8.3 5G's body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than HTC One M9's, although it is way heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but Nokia 8.3 5G has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some additional features.
The HTC One M9 has a sharper screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display. HTC One M9 counts with a little better hardware performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU.
The Nokia 8.3 5G's camera is very similar to the HTC One M9 one, and although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, they both have the same video frame rate, the same back camera sensor size and the same video definition.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One M9, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.