Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9.3 PureView has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. Nokia 9.3 PureView's body is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than HTC One M9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 9.3 PureView has 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better display than Nokia 9.3 PureView, although it has a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a way smaller display and a little bit lower screen pixels density.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has a very superior memory to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 9.3 PureView features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% greater battery capacity.
Nokia 9.3 PureView shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.