Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's general score of 76.4. HTC One M9's design is a little bit lighter than Nokia 9 PureView, although it is thicker and was released many years before. HTC One M9 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a quite worse pixels density, a way worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit smaller display. HTC One M9 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a much better 20 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 9 PureView features greater battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the HTC One M9 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.