Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Ocean |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Although OPPO Find X2 Pro is extremely heavier than HTC One M9, it's a little bit thinner and much newer.
HTC One M9 counts with a little faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little sharper display than HTC One M9, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a little bit greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, faster video frame rate and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.