Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a global score of 77.7 against 77. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. The HTC One M9 construction is notably thicker but somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much bigger aperture and a much more MP back facing camera. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 has a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.