Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with a overall score of 82.1 against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G construction is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit CPU. HTC One M9 has a much sharper display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A13 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 128 GB. The Galaxy A13 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.