Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 overall score. HTC One M9's construction is extremely lighter but somewhat thicker than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. HTC One M9 features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The HTC One M9 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back camera with a lot lower resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 5G features a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.