Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than the Galaxy A20s, getting a overall score of 77.7 against 77. HTC One M9's construction is somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A20s, but it's thicker and was released 5 years before. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11.
HTC One M9 counts with a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel density and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The HTC One M9 shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot higher resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A20s has a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 41% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.