Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than Galaxy A22, with a overall score of 77.7 against 76.1. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Although the HTC One M9 is much older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A22, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A22, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit processing unit. HTC One M9 features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
HTC One M9 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos and a lot less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.