Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than HTC One M9, with a overall score of 84.6 against 77.7. The Galaxy A22 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's way heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of display. HTC One M9 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low light images and a way more megapixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.