Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it gives you a couple additional features. The Galaxy A25 5G is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner device than HTC One M9, although it's heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.