Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's design is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the HTC One M9. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
HTC One M9 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a GPU. HTC One M9 features a slightly better display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a much tinier sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a back facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.