Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-04-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G's design is incredibly newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has a more recent 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One M9 features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A33 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
HTC One M9 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. The HTC One M9 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a smaller camera aperture and a camera with way less megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A33 5G features a really longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.