Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a bit better than HTC One M9, with a general score of 82.9 against 77.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has newer 13 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, offering some additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy A34 is a a lot lighter and thinner phone than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processing unit. HTC One M9 features a sharper display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
HTC One M9 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller back-facing camera sensor. HTC One M9 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.