Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's design is extremely newer and thinner than HTC One M9's, but it's also much heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor. The HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A35 5G shoots better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger sensor capturing better quality pictures and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
The Galaxy A35 5G has much more memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A35 5G features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.