Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is a bit better than HTC One M9, with an 81.7 score against 77.7. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A41 construction is much newer, just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. HTC One M9 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A41 captures much better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Galaxy A41 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with greater battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.