Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a bit better than HTC One M9, having an 85.5 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The Galaxy A51 body is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but just a little bit heavier than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU. HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy A51 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A51 captures better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also has a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a back camera with a much better 48 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy A51 features a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.