Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism cube black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than HTC One M9, having a 90.8 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is heavier.
The HTC One M9 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor. HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher resolution camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.