Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is heavier than HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU. HTC One M9 features a better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 58 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot more MP camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.