Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than HTC One M9, with a 91.1 score against 77.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has a more recent 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Although the Galaxy A52s is heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and much newer. The HTC One M9 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The HTC One M9 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A52s takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A52s features a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.